From diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org Wed Jul 23 23:53:03 2008 From: diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org (diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org) Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:53:03 +0000 Subject: Status? Message-ID: <072320082353.13735.4887C45F000BFD33000035A72205886360020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> Hey Greg - I was wondering if you have any plans on getting those GCC 4.3.x updates posted anytime soonish. :) I've been super busy the past few months myself and haven't had time to check into things, but that's all cleared up on my end now so I figured I'd check in! Rich From diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org Thu Jul 24 12:20:58 2008 From: diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org (Greg Schafer) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 22:20:58 +1000 Subject: Status? In-Reply-To: <072320082353.13735.4887C45F000BFD33000035A72205886360020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> References: <072320082353.13735.4887C45F000BFD33000035A72205886360020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> Message-ID: <20080724122058.GA20407@eyo32.local> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:53:03PM +0000, rcedelman@comcast.net wrote: > I was wondering if you have any plans on getting those GCC 4.3.x updates > posted anytime soonish. :) Yeah, sorry. Starting to fall behind... :-( > I've been super busy the past few months myself and haven't had time to > check into things, but that's all cleared up on my end now so I figured > I'd check in! Thanks for asking. It's frustrating me greatly that I can't find the time for DIY building lately. About 18 mths ago I decided to become self-employed with a view to having more play time. It started out well but now I'm getting lots more work, and I simply have to make hay while the sun shines.. I haven't tested 4.3.1 yet and I haven't yet figured out what to do about Glibc 2.8 now that "Tarballs are a completely outdated concept". But don't worry, I'm itching to get the Refbuild up-to-date and I can see some free time coming up soon. Regards Greg From diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org Thu Jul 24 17:28:05 2008 From: diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org (diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 17:28:05 +0000 Subject: Status? Message-ID: <072420081728.8127.4888BBA50004DD0600001FBF2207002953020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> From: Greg Schafer > I haven't tested 4.3.1 yet and I haven't yet figured out what to do about > Glibc 2.8 now that "Tarballs are a completely outdated concept". But don't > worry, I'm itching to get the Refbuild up-to-date and I can see some free > time coming up soon. > > Regards > Greg I hate to say it but I think the only way to really handle the new glibc release debacle is for someone to package up a tarball from CVS and host that. It's either that, or introducing CVS to the refbuild or as a host requirement. I suppose that introducing it as a host requirement isn't that bad really, but IMO it needlessly complications things. Rich From diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org Thu Jul 24 17:41:42 2008 From: diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=FCrg?= Billeter) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 19:41:42 +0200 Subject: Status? In-Reply-To: <072420081728.8127.4888BBA50004DD0600001FBF2207002953020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> References: <072420081728.8127.4888BBA50004DD0600001FBF2207002953020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> Message-ID: <1216921302.3568.3.camel@jdesktop.bitron.ch> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 17:28 +0000, rcedelman@comcast.net wrote: > From: Greg Schafer >=20 > > I haven't tested 4.3.1 yet and I haven't yet figured out what to do abo= ut > > Glibc 2.8 now that "Tarballs are a completely outdated concept". But do= n't > > worry, I'm itching to get the Refbuild up-to-date and I can see some fr= ee > > time coming up soon. > > I hate to say it but I think the only way to really handle the new > glibc release debacle is for someone to package up a tarball from CVS > and host that. It's either that, or introducing CVS to the refbuild or > as a host requirement. I suppose > that introducing it as a host requirement isn't that bad really, but > IMO it needlessly complications things. ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/glibc/snapshots/ J=C3=BCrg From diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org Thu Jul 24 18:12:05 2008 From: diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org (diy-linux-dev@diy-linux.org) Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:12:05 +0000 Subject: Status? Message-ID: <072420081812.23034.4888C5F50002D6F5000059FA2202888744020E03040A0B0A0C9D@comcast.net> From: Jürg Billeter > On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 17:28 +0000, rcedelman@comcast.net wrote: > > From: Greg Schafer > > > > > I haven't tested 4.3.1 yet and I haven't yet figured out what to do about > > > Glibc 2.8 now that "Tarballs are a completely outdated concept". But don't > > > worry, I'm itching to get the Refbuild up-to-date and I can see some free > > > time coming up soon. > > > > I hate to say it but I think the only way to really handle the new > > glibc release debacle is for someone to package up a tarball from CVS > > and host that. It's either that, or introducing CVS to the refbuild or > > as a host requirement. I suppose > > that introducing it as a host requirement isn't that bad really, but > > IMO it needlessly complications things. > > ftp://sources.redhat.com/pub/glibc/snapshots/ Well there we go then, someone's packaging them up and putting them somewhere ;)